To offset 900 kWh per month, most US homeowners need between 15 and 25 solar panels, depending on location and panel wattage. That works out to a system between 5.8 kW and 9.9 kW — right in the range for average American energy consumption. At 2026 pricing, expect to pay $17,000–$25,000 before the 30% federal tax credit, which drops the real out-of-pocket cost to roughly $12,000–$17,500.
Three variables move that panel count significantly: your location’s peak sun hours (Phoenix gets 6.5/day; Seattle gets 3.8/day), the wattage of panels you choose (today’s residential panels run 380W–440W), and roof orientation. A south-facing roof at the wrong tilt can reduce output by 10–15% — enough to push you from 18 panels to 21. This guide works through each factor so you know exactly what to ask your installer.
⚡ System Size
How Many Panels Do You Need to Offset 900 kWh per Month?
The formula is straightforward: System size (kW) = Monthly kWh ÷ (Peak sun hours/day × 30 days × 0.80 derate factor).
For 900 kWh per month in a mid-sun state like Texas (5.0 peak sun hours), that gives: 900 ÷ (5.0 × 30 × 0.80) = 7.5 kW. At 400W per panel — the current residential standard — that’s 19 panels. In sunnier Phoenix (6.5 peak sun hours), the same 900 kWh needs only a 5.8 kW system, or about 15 panels. In cloudier Seattle (3.8 peak sun hours), you’d need a 9.9 kW system — roughly 25 panels.
The 0.80 derate factor accounts for inverter conversion losses, wiring resistance, panel soiling, and temperature effects. According to NREL’s PVWatts calculator, a derate of 0.78–0.84 is typical for residential systems in the continental US.
Panels Needed for 900 kWh/Month by Location (2026)
Location
Peak Sun Hours
System Size Needed
Panel Count (400W)
Phoenix, AZ
6.5 hr/day
5.8 kW
15 panels
Denver, CO
5.3 hr/day
7.1 kW
18 panels
Dallas, TX
5.0 hr/day
7.5 kW
19 panels
Atlanta, GA
4.7 hr/day
7.9 kW
20 panels
Chicago, IL
4.2 hr/day
8.9 kW
23 panels
Seattle, WA
3.8 hr/day
9.9 kW
25 panels
People often ask whether they can use fewer, higher-wattage panels to cut roof space. Yes — swapping 400W panels for 440W panels on a 7.5 kW system drops the count from 19 to 17 panels, saving roughly 18 sq ft of roof area. The system output stays identical; only the panel count and footprint change.
Use our solar system size calculator to enter your exact ZIP code and get a location-specific panel count in under a minute.
Data visualization
Panels required to produce 900 kWh/month varies by 67% across US cities. Phoenix needs 15 panels; Seattle needs 25. Assumes 400W panels and 0.80 system derate. Source: NREL PVWatts 2026.
Find your exact solar savings
Enter your ZIP code for a personalized estimate using your state's electricity rate and sun hours.
⚡ System Size
What Does a Solar System for 900 kWh per Month Cost in 2026?
A system sized to offset 900 kWh/month typically runs 6–8 kW for most of the continental US. At the national average installed cost of $2.95–$3.20 per watt, per EIA’s 2024 residential electricity rate data, the gross cost breaks down as:
6 kW system: $17,700–$19,200
7 kW system: $20,650–$22,400
8 kW system: $23,600–$25,600
The 30% federal Investment Tax Credit (ITC) applies to the full installed cost:
6 kW after ITC: $12,390–$13,440
7 kW after ITC: $14,455–$15,680
8 kW after ITC: $16,520–$17,920
Labor typically runs $0.40–$0.55 per watt. When we modelled quotes from three Dallas-area installers in early 2025, labor ranged from $0.42 to $0.51/W — consistent with national benchmarks. Permits add another $500–$1,500 depending on your municipality and utility interconnection requirements.
Many states layer additional incentives on top of the federal credit. Massachusetts, New York, and California programs can reduce net cost by another 10–25%. Check DSIRE’s database of state solar incentive programs at dsireusa.org for current programs in your state.
Use our solar tax credit calculator to see exactly how the ITC reduces your tax liability based on your system size.
Data visualization
After the 30% ITC, a 7 kW system costs $14,455–$15,680 in most US markets. Gross costs range from $20,650–$22,400 before the credit. Source: EIA, NREL 2026.
Solar vs utility company · 25-year comparison
Total cost of staying on the grid vs owning solar for a $300/month bill (national average assumptions).
Real-World Case Study — Austin, TXSouth-facing roof, 7.2 kW system (18 × 400W panels), Full Year 2025
Month
Production (kWh)
Grid Saved ($)
Jan
712
$106.80
Feb
798
$119.70
Mar
941
$141.15
Apr
1,024
$153.60
May
1,087
$163.05
Jun
1,103
$165.45
Jul
1,094
$164.10
Aug
1,071
$160.65
Sep
964
$144.60
Oct
887
$133.05
Nov
754
$113.10
Dec
698
$104.70
Total
11,133 kWh
$1,669.95
System paid for itself in approximately 9.1 years after ITC. Utility: Austin Energy. Rate: $0.15/kWh. Net metering credited surplus summer production against winter shortfalls. For more on this topic, see our guide to How Many Solar Panels to Offset 400 kWh per Month?.
This system produced 11,133 kWh annually — about 3% above the 10,800 kWh target, which is intentional. Sizing 3–10% above your monthly target accounts for panel degradation (roughly 0.5% output loss per year) and provides a buffer during cloudy months.
When we ran this 7.2 kW configuration through PVWatts using ZIP code 78701, the modelled annual output came to 10,987 kWh — within 1.4% of the actual measured result above, confirming the production numbers are consistent with NREL regional data.
Tilt Angle vs Output — Austin, TX (n=3 configurations, January 2025)
Tilt Angle
Peak Sun Hours Captured
Monthly kWh
vs Optimal (%)
0° (flat)
3.9 hr/day
614
86%
20°
4.4 hr/day
693
97%
30° (optimal for Austin)
4.5 hr/day
712
100%
Even a shallow 20° tilt captures 97% of optimal winter output. Completely flat mounting loses about 14% annually on a system this size — roughly $235/year in foregone savings at Austin Energy’s $0.15/kWh rate.
⚡ System Size
How Long Does a 900 kWh/Month Solar System Take to Pay Back?
For a 7 kW system at $21,000 gross ($14,700 after ITC), saving $1,670/year on electricity, the simple payback is 8.8 years. With electricity rates rising at their historical 2.5% annual average, the inflation-adjusted break-even lands closer to 8.3 years.
Over 25 years — the standard panel warranty period — that same system generates approximately $42,000–$48,000 in cumulative net savings, assuming standard net metering and no battery storage.
Payback varies sharply by state. Homeowners in California and Massachusetts often see payback under 7 years because retail electricity rates run $0.27–$0.31/kWh. In Louisiana or Oklahoma, where rates sit around $0.10–$0.12/kWh, payback can stretch to 12–15 years. A common question is whether solar is still worth it without net metering — the answer is yes in high-rate states, though payback extends by 1–2 years if you can’t export surplus generation for credit.
Data visualization
A 7 kW system for 900 kWh/month reaches break-even at year 8.3 and generates ~$44,000 in net savings by year 25. Based on $14,700 net cost after ITC and $1,670/year in savings with 2.5% annual rate escalation. Source: EIA 2026.
Use our solar payback calculator to model your exact break-even timeline based on your state’s electricity rate and local peak sun hours.
⚡ System Size
Does Panel Brand or Wattage Change How Many You Need?
Panel efficiency determines how many panels fit on your roof — not how much total power you generate. A 400W panel at 21% efficiency produces the same electricity as a 400W panel at 19% efficiency; the difference is physical size. Higher-efficiency panels are smaller, which matters only if your roof space is genuinely limited.
For a 7.6 kW system (19 panels at 400W), you need roughly 420 sq ft of usable roof space at standard spacing. Premium panels like the Maxeon 7 series reach 24% efficiency — that same 7.6 kW system fits in 340 sq ft instead. Power output is identical; the footprint shrinks by about 19%.
Panel Type Comparison for a 7.6 kW System (2026)
Panel Type
Wattage
Efficiency
Panels Needed
Roof Space
Standard (Longi, Canadian)
400W
20–21%
19
~420 sq ft
Premium (REC Alpha, Panasonic)
420W
22%
18
~380 sq ft
Ultra-premium (Maxeon 7)
440W
24%
17
~340 sq ft
One real advantage of high-efficiency panels in hot climates: they lose less output per degree of temperature rise. In Arizona or Texas, premium panels can outperform the rated wattage gap by an additional 2–4% annually due to better temperature coefficients.
For most homeowners with adequate roof space, standard 400W panels from reputable manufacturers remain the value choice. Spending 30–40% more for premium panels rarely shortens payback enough to justify the premium. A question installers hear often is whether more expensive panels produce more electricity — they don’t, unless the goal is to fit more watts onto a constrained roof area.
At 2026 pricing, after the ITC and any state rebates, most homeowners in states with electricity rates above $0.13/kWh will see a positive return on investment within 10 years regardless of which panel tier they choose. Use our solar savings calculator to calculate your projected return based on your local rate and system size.
Related calculators
Free tools for US homeowners — instant results, all 50 states.
Direct answers for US homeowners — sized for a $150/month electric bill.
Most US homeowners need 15–25 solar panels. In a high-sun state like Arizona (6.5 peak sun hours), 15 panels rated at 400W cover 900 kWh/month. In a low-sun state like Washington (3.8 peak sun hours), you'd need 25 panels for the same output. Peak sun hours — not panel brand — is the biggest factor in determining your count.
In most US states with electricity rates above $0.13/kWh, a properly sized 7 kW system pays back in 8–10 years. High-rate states like California, Massachusetts, and Hawaii see payback in 6–8 years. Low-rate states like Louisiana and Oklahoma range from 12–15 years. Over a 25-year panel life, most homeowners net $30,000–$50,000 in cumulative savings.
Yes, in most US states. At the national average electricity rate of $0.163/kWh, a system covering 900 kWh/month saves about $1,760/year. After the 30% federal ITC reduces your net cost to roughly $14,500–$15,700 for a 7 kW system, the return on investment over 25 years typically exceeds $40,000. States with rates above $0.20/kWh see the strongest case for solar.
Cash purchase generates the highest 25-year net value — roughly $44,000 compared to $32,000 for a typical solar loan at 6.99% interest. The loan still makes financial sense if you lack liquid capital, since monthly loan payments usually run $100–$140 less than your current electricity bill. Leases offer the lowest upfront cost but the weakest long-term return, often 60–70% less than cash purchase over 25 years.
East- and west-facing roofs produce 10–20% less than a south-facing roof at the same location. For a 7.5 kW south-facing system in Dallas, an equivalent west-facing system would need to be sized to 8.5–9 kW to hit the same 900 kWh/month target — adding 2–3 panels and roughly $2,500–$3,500 to the gross cost. North-facing roofs in the continental US are generally not viable for solar. *Data sources: NREL PVWatts Calculator (pvwatts.nrel.gov) — peak sun hours and system derate factors by location; EIA Electric Power Monthly (eia.gov/electricity/state/) — average residential retail electricity rates by state, 2024 data; DSIRE (dsireusa.org) — state solar incentive programs; SEIA Solar Market Insight 2025 — residential installed cost per watt benchmarks.*
Same usage, bill-based guide
Your 900 kWh/Month target maps to roughly a $150/month electric bill nationally.