Is Solar Worth It for a 1,900 sq ft Home by State?
Solar delivers its strongest returns in states combining high electricity rates, strong net metering, and generous state incentives — not necessarily the sunniest states. According to SEIA’s 2025 Solar Market Insight report, the top five states for residential solar ROI in 2026 are Massachusetts, California, New Jersey, New York, and Hawaii. All five have electricity rates above $0.22/kWh and favorable export compensation policies.
That said, solar is increasingly viable across much more of the country. Florida, Arizona, and Colorado all offer payback periods under 9 years for a properly sized system. Even Ohio and Illinois homeowners are seeing 9–11 year paybacks as electricity rates have risen 18–22% since 2022 per EIA data. A common question is whether solar is worth it without strong net metering — and the honest answer is that battery storage increasingly fills that gap, letting you self-consume more of what you generate rather than exporting at reduced rates.
Solar is generally worth pursuing if your electricity rate is above $0.12/kWh, your roof has at least 15 years of life remaining, you have south-, east-, or west-facing sections with minimal shade, you plan to stay in the home for at least 7 years, and you have federal tax liability to use the 30% ITC. Solar becomes a harder financial case in states with poor net metering, on north-facing roofs, or where utility rates sit below $0.10/kWh.
One factor more homeowners are weighing in 2026: adding a home battery alongside the solar array. A Tesla Powerwall 3 (13.5 kWh) adds $10,000–$13,000 to system cost but also qualifies for the 30% ITC and enables time-of-use arbitrage by storing cheap off-peak solar and avoiding peak-rate grid draw. Over a 25-year system life, that combination typically adds $8,000–$15,000 in additional value over solar alone in high-rate markets.